| Freakling | | |
Solid, if somewhat basic, 2-layout.
I would suggest to find a good place for +1 gas expo though. |
| CrystalDrag | | |
This has got me thinking of a new concept :D after AP Testing....
AP CHEMISTRY TEST WAS SO HARD. |
| CrystalDrag | | |
| This post is not displayed due to its content |
| NegativeZero | | |
There's your additional gas base, lol.
The original goal of the map was to be somewhat low in the base/resource count but I guess since that would disfavor zerg, having a geyser at every base is only fair to compensate.
Also I've realized that I'm basically completely incapable of not ripping off an SC2 map layout even when I don't try - now when I look at this map all I see is its resemblance to Daybreak. Maybe I just need to drop everything standard and go full asymmetrical, mineral-glitching, neutral-spamming retard mode... |
| traceurling | | |
| Ap Chem ezpz got fucked over by ap art history today I'm actually worried I might get a 3.:. |
| NegativeZero | | |
| Name changed, because chemistry. |
| CrystalDrag | | |
| only thing i don't like about using an even number of bridges in the middle is that pathing of SCI will make the units go through one bridge only... |
| gnom | | |
Hum, what about this ultra short nat2nat distance?
If I come to think of it, the 3rds are pretty easy to hold for, plus they kind of defend your main from getting dropped. If this was your goal then i didn't say a word but still its a very little risk for a high reward if you take the 3rds. |
