| manbearpig | | |
| Map is 192 by 128 and i have not gotten to doing decoration and such yet i was just wondering if theres anything terribly wrong with the layout or anything like that |
| Starparty | | |
| really like the layout and such, but the size might be a bit big tbh. depends on what your aims are with the map though |
| JotoDragoon | | |
I like the layout and idea, but it seems a little too open. It might be hard for Terran, since surrounding and flanking should be simple enough. Also, those middle islands are in siege range, right?
modified by JotoDragoon |
| manbearpig | | |
| i have a different version of this one that i made thats 128 by 128 that gave me the idea for this setup that i could rework to be this same basic thing on 128 by 128 possibly but i have to go to work right now so itl have to wait and i belive the gas is slightly im in the process of testing that |
| manbearpig | | |
| would changing the map size be the best course of action or should i simply try to improve what is already there |
| SiaBBo | | |
| It looks way too big. |
| FateD | | |
well, in my opinion, if you only made the side paths n middle one a lil larger, there wouldnt be any problem at all..
would be a pure macro map, but we have to have some, dont we? :) |
| JungleTerrain | | |
Friken Gigantic
O my god, imagine Cross positions, that'll be simply decapitating.
modified by JungleTerrain |
| manbearpig | | |
| I made the changes that fateD suggested to the best of my ability and i was kind of going for the macro map setup however i do agree that it still feels really big i think il just end up submitting the smaller version as a different map with possibly a tile set i havent done much with yet, after this one is finished with that is |
(4)Hammer
