| BWMN Time |
| 12/16/2025 |
| 14:34 |
| News |
| new account |
| list users |
| Login: |
| Replays |
| Map DB |
| ICCup |
| Map Access |
| New map |
| Edit map |
 |
Forum - main
Why is Python Bad? page: 1 | ||
| I've heard some of your site members boasting that Python is a bad standard map. What is bad about it? How could it be improved? Is the high terrain too advantageous for terran and is the distance to third expo too far? Is the bottleneck at the third expo to wide? I like the way the mineral nat is because people tend to not scout it often. | ||
| 2009, 05, 02 20:29 | ||
| If there is anything bad about python at all, then the macro-style you have to play on it. The map balance is great. | ||
| 2009, 05, 02 20:32 | ||
| I think it's good. | ||
| 2009, 05, 03 23:42 | ||
| people just say that because its over used | ||
| 2009, 05, 11 00:53 | ||
| I think the map is maybe a step up from Luna, but a step down from LT. This map is old and played out and boring standard macro map. There is literally nothing interesting in the huge waste of space in the middle. | ||
| 2009, 06, 10 12:38 | ||
| It's not a waste of space. Python 1.3 is a LOT better than LT in ALL aspects, to suggest otherwise is really quite laughable. | ||
| 2009, 06, 11 10:47 | ||
| page: 1 | ||
Reply:
You have to be logged in to post
 |