|STIMEY D OKGM FISH|
|This is Bill307's edit. The closest catagory it fits right now would be User maps - final, although technically it was used in one of those shitty leagues that we shouldn't count as justification for a "Pro maps" status.|
|no...It's a classic. Everyone knows LT, 2.4 is just the best of all versions, but still LT, which is a blizzard map. |
modified by panschk[FP]
|I'd agree... perhaps "mod by bill" if anything.|
|hah rep uploaded on lt ;=)|
|Ah, good old LT, still one of the simplest and unbalanced maps out there, and the most played of course. But, who cares? we love LT, don't we? :)|
|the GAMEI version >>>>>>>>>>>> this one|
i dont like the changes at 12... LT lives from its asymetries and so it shall stay ^^
|2.4 rocks. 1-2 Years ago I had the same point of view as you have, changing LT (esp. the 1000 different versions) seemed just wrong to me. But now that I care more about gameplay and balancing than a few years ago, where it all was about uniqueness for me, I think it was neccesary to fix LT. Why should controlling the cliff at 9 mean killing two expos, while it only affects one on all other positions. Why should you need 3 hatch expo at 12 and nowhere else? |
It's still not perfect, but balancing wise better solutions like "the lost shrine" are too much changes imo.
I would not play any other LT version anymore:)
|btw I changed it to "classic". Calling LT a user map is just wrong...|
|you need to redo your categories imo. what's the point of "classic?" u should have a category called "semi-pro" for maps that have been used in some leagues, tourneys, decent stuff like that but not the good korea leagues (pro).|
LT deserves more to be "semi-pro" than "classic" which includes blizz maps no one should really play anymore.
then u could rename "classic" to "blizzard" or whatever.
u could also seperate pro further by having "current pro" and "retired pro"
in short, i hate "classic" idea. and we need "semipro" to differentiate between user-final maps that have gotten play and those that haven't.
|how can anyone say this map is unbalanced when it has the most even stats on pgt?|
|LT 2.4 is easily the best version. But if somone wanted this map perfectly balanced it would still need alot of work.|
If zerg is at the 9 oclock main, cant zerg fast expo easier?
Before, Its min only was tankable from the highground.
In current versions, 3 + 6 still have min onlies that can be seiged by tanks on opposite side of walls, 12 + 6 dont have that.
still love the map tho
|it is POSITIONAL imbalanced, not race-wise|
|I like the positional imbalance (except when i get 12/3 -_-) It makes for variance in the games instead of each base being exactly the same amount of space away from each other. |
Edit watch the rep i just uploaded, its funny :D
modified by decafchicken
|it favors some strats and limits some. you can do dt drop on terran quite good on 9-6 while you cannot on 9-12. you can go FE being zerg with 2 hatch on 9o'clock in ZvT, while you can't even go 3-hatch if you're on 12 and terran on 3...|
that's fucked up, nothing more -.-
|Pfft, i fast expo 12/3 in zvt all the time. Just learn how to micro your drones to kill off bunker rushes and you're fine.|
|+1 clone card|
looks like all other card on BWMN, try make interesting cards
decaf: you can't build sunkens to your expo AND your main if you're as zerg on 12.
|look at the TvT rep IDoGayStrats vs mydahlia04|
|decaf: you can't build sunkens to your expo AND your main if you're as zerg on 12.|
I never have any problems.
|but shitbad eco then =)|
|PvT 9/3 is terrible.|
|PvT 12/3 is even more terrible.|
|Soooo imba map -.-|
|rep added;bluelark vs.BHolder.watch it!it's better than pay-tv -_-|
|Oh yes! It certainly is. The best part imo was when the toss stormed his own templars with no enemy units anywhere near them!|
Really, better than any comedy!
So, which of these two is you, Grief? And may I see in that replay the reason for your taste of maps?
|"So, which of these two is you, Grief?"neither.bholder is a friend.he play twice as much than i.actually in the last time i dont find the time to play.honestly i dont think the rep is so bad;btw i havent find a better rep uploaded by u. |
"And may I see in that replay the reason for your taste of maps?".not at all.the reason why i upload the rep wasnt the map itself it was the rep.if you ask me,i think bholder joined into this game.
"Really, better than any comedy!"no kidding.you wanna see some funny reps?i can upload for you the matches from last year betweeen ToT and Strelok.oh that was pure entertainment.i have laughed until my teeth fail out.the whole clan destroyed by one unknown dude.wanna see mondragon inside his main with no chance to come out,like a noob?or selector down under 10 min.?those reps have really pro-quality,but just because of strelok,thanks to him.cause the ToT dudes show no more skills than bluelark in the game with bholder..
|strelok has already been a powerhouse when he defeated tot, well it was shocking, but still so far from "comedy of an unknown dude" :)|
|yeah,after.but i pointed to the time before that games.before,he was a nobody.|
|"cause the ToT dudes show no more skills than bluelark in the game with bholder.."|
ROFL I haven't seen worse players than those in quite some time and you say ToT was worse? lol.
And no, I won't start spamming bwmn with reps of my matches on LT, Luna, Gaia and such. Those certainly show higher skill than this rep. Even alone because of the skill of my enemies, and I win quite a lot lately... (2n2 mostly, though).
|I hate this map. Whenever I play it I just get this terrible urge to break something. :(|
|LT2.4 is the best LT version out there and still great to play. Maybe not balanced enough for important matches, but fine for some fun 2n2s.|
|cant som1 make a mirrored lt? XY mirror|
|I personally have no problem with this map. Imo I think mirroring it would take out the classic LT feel.|
|There are many maps that are basically LT but more symmetrical. Just dig^^|
|wth? Don't bump a map for no reason.|
|wtf marjoo i wanted to say that!|
|fix pix plx|