Well, they are tough maps to make. A well made 3 player map is a considerable achievement. And I think they are cool. But I take it that you think they are not popular enough or relevant enough. Is that it?
Yeah, I guess my argument could be made for 5 and 7 and why not 6 and 8 players maps and that is too many. So why 2 and 4 player maps and not the others? So I guess you would answer that they are the most common maps.
Damn! I promised myself I would not post at 1 AM again!
i'd say make it (4)moty and 2/3-moty, as it is not the number of players that makes the difference, but the ability of playing competitive 2on2 on it.
in 1on1, it doesnt really matter if the number is 2 or 3. it's 1on1 anyway in 99,99% of all cases...