| negativeentropy | | |
| 2v2 allied map. |
| FateD | | |
Negative, I cant say i have much experience in dual bases map, but logically, your paths (that works for all the maps ive seen from u so far i think) should all be much wider around (i like the ceoncept behind em tho) :D
happy Xmas all |
| ludamad | | |
| You really like 2v2 allied maps negative ;). There isn't so much to say about each one, but the deco leaves a bit to be desired. Also, watch out for the terran players lifting to the corners. |
| negativeentropy | | |
Fated: you might be right but i dont want to make my maps too open either; that just lead to "attack move friendly" gameplay.
Ludamad: my deco is amateurish I know. Im trying to improve on that :P.
Thanks for feedback and merry x-mas. |
| LML | | |
| well, but you MUST make it wider to make it used on ground. Even for a 1v1 there is not enough space, how do you want to atk with 2players then?! |
| uC.MorroW | | |
polar bears on only 1 side = imba.
interesting with 2v2 allied maps but no good battle middle arena. x2 terran mass tank turtle wins |
| FateD | | |
hmm omg!! Morrow was right!!!!! polar bears make it ALL IMBA :(
i mean, shouldnt both side have their polar bears??? their so cute... :D lol |
| negativeentropy | | |
| Dont underestimate the Pumas; they can go toe to toe with the polar bears. |
| FateD | | |
**throws the pumas into the garbage can** NO >:(
**goes beserk n requests bears** XD lol
:D |
(4)Aztlan
